« Poor little Jay | Main | russian roulette »

split decision


I have never known a player like Stiliyan Petrov.
Well, more accurately, I mean I have never known opinion so varied and so split down the middle about a player.
Football is a game about opinion.
Two blokes can see a game and argue throughout the night, even if they support the same team.
We all have favourites.
I still think David James was the best goalkeeper Villa have had since Rimmer and Spink, although I understand Mark Bosnich's claims.
I think Mark Delaney was a terrific right back... that George Boateng's exit to Middlesbrough was a huge dent to the side... that David Ginola was a waste of time...as was Peter Schmeichel...that Bosko Balaban could, just could have become a half-decent player- though never £6million worth- if he had scored that one-on-one at Southampton.
I thought James Milner was a lot of huff and puff but not always with an end produce, I thought Nobby Salano was lovely to watch at times but shouldn't really have been anywhere near a Villa shirt, particularly away from home... that Hassan Kachloul showed real promise.
We all thought Steven Davis was a real class home-grown player, as the majority of us still do about Gary Cahill.
I can't fathom how bad Marlon Harewood has become, even in the reserves, I wonder just why Martin O'Neill signed him or for that matter, Zat Knight, when Olof Mellberg and Martin Laursen would be my dream ticket.
I could go on and on but you probably get the message.
Back to Petrov.
Most, including manager and player himself, agree he has had a pretty torrid time of it in 15 months at Villa.
I remember his good games off the top of my head: Watford, West Ham, Sheffield United, Tottenham, Everton, Chelsea...don't think I've missed one.
He gets dropped after two and-a-half games this season, then what happens? He's back in at Bolton, keeps his place against Derby and wins huge plaudits in the derby win at Blues.
Now I saw all three of those games.
And I have to ask myself, am I now prejudiced to an extent, against him because of past faults?
I thought Petrov was poor at Blues. He didn't do much for me, he was presented with a few chances to dart into the box but elected a square or a backward pass.
And there was one shot that must have worried the nearby busses.
I sat next to another journalist last Sunday. And we were aghast at some of his decisions.
But I came away from the game and first heard Martin O'Neill singing his priases (well, he would, wouldn't he after spending £7million?) and that coloured my judgement to a degree.
I then walked into the press room where a very well-spoken Martin Keown was singing his praises big-style. "He is a total footballer", said Keown.
Garry Thompson, my old mate, was somewhere inbetween but more favouring the school of thought that Petrov could be some player.
I don't disagree. There must be something there as O'Neill, I admit, is some scout of talent.
But having spent the last few days since St Andrew's talking to fans and the like, I still can't get to grips with the differences of opinion that this one player can garner.
Somebody help!

Comments (1)

Lara Schmidt:

Petrov, for sure he makes my heart go all fluttery

Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 16, 2007 12:50 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Poor little Jay.

The next post in this blog is russian roulette.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31